Overview
CoProxy sells four separate product lines: mobile proxies, rotating residential proxies, static datacentre proxies and static residential (ISP) proxies. No country list is recorded for any of these, so geographic coverage is not something this profile can confirm one way or the other. The four lines are priced and billed differently, which points to a provider positioning itself across both rotating, high-volume use cases and static, IP-based use cases rather than specialising in one.
What the record shows
CoProxy states that authentication is by username and password, and documents HTTP and HTTPS as the supported protocols; SOCKS5 is not mentioned anywhere in the record, so it should be treated as absent rather than assumed. The provider describes its IP sourcing as an “ethically sourced network” and states a pool size of 90M+ IPs, both provider claims rather than independently verified figures. Rotation is offered in both rotating and static forms, and targeting is documented down to country, state, ASN and carrier level, which is a relatively granular offer if it holds up in practice. Support is stated as 24/7 live chat with technical specialists. On uptime, CoProxy states a 99%+ success rate; this is the provider's own claim and no testing has been carried out here to confirm it. The refund position is worth flagging separately: it is not documented in CoProxy's own stated terms, and the only mention on record comes from a customer testimonial referring to a refund policy being in place. That is weaker evidence than a provider-stated policy, so anyone relying on refunds should get the terms confirmed directly rather than assuming the testimonial reflects current or universal policy. Finally, there is no country list recorded at all, which matters for anyone with location-specific targeting needs.
Pricing
Entry prices vary by line and by billing unit. Mobile proxies start at GBP 1.19 per GB and rotating residential proxies start at GBP 0.52 per GB, both billed on data usage. Static datacentre proxies start at GBP 0.02 per IP and static residential (ISP) proxies start at GBP 3.3 per IP, both billed per IP rather than per GB. Because the units differ, the per-GB and per-IP prices are not directly comparable as numbers; a heavy-usage buyer on a per-GB plan and a buyer holding a fixed set of static IPs will see very different cost drivers. On the per-IP lines specifically, CoProxy is recorded as cheaper than 100% of the nine providers in this directory that also bill per IP, which is a relevant comparison point for the datacentre and ISP products but does not extend to the two per-GB lines.
Who it suits
The documented targeting granularity (country, state, ASN, carrier) and the spread across mobile, residential, datacentre and ISP lines suggest this fits buyers who need to mix rotating and static IPs across different jobs, particularly where carrier- or ASN-level targeting matters. The per-IP pricing on datacentre and ISP lines may also appeal to buyers who want a fixed, predictable IP cost rather than usage-based billing. It is less suited to anyone who specifically needs SOCKS5 support, since that is not documented, or to anyone whose project depends on confirmed coverage in particular countries, since no country list is recorded. Buyers who need a firm, provider-stated refund guarantee before committing should also be cautious, given the refund position rests on a testimonial rather than stated policy.
Where to look closer
Before buying, it is worth asking CoProxy directly for a country-by-country coverage list, since none is recorded here. Ask for the refund policy in writing, given the only reference on record is a customer testimonial rather than a provider-stated term. It is also worth asking whether SOCKS5 is available, since only HTTP and HTTPS are documented, and asking what methodology sits behind the 99%+ success rate claim, since that figure is stated by the provider and has not been independently tested by this site.
This assessment is editorial analysis of the sourced facts recorded on this page. Specifications, pricing and coverage are provider-stated and dated in the panels above. No controlled performance test has been run against this provider.
